Trump: ‘The Second Amendment will never be repealed

President Trump in a tweet early Wednesday said the Second Amendment will never be repealed, despite a former Supreme Court justice’s words, and called for more Republicans to be elected in this year’s midterm elections.


“As much as Democrats would like to see this happen, and despite the words yesterday of former Supreme Court Justice Stevens, NO WAY,” he added.

“We need more Republicans in 2018 and must ALWAYS hold the Supreme Court!”

Trump tweet follows an op-ed from former Supreme Court Justice John Paul Stevens, who said that the Second Amendment is outdated and misunderstood.

Stevens, a Republican, wrote in The New York Times on Tuesday said that students and anti-gun violence advocates should press lawmakers to “enact legislation prohibiting civilian ownership of semiautomatic weapons, increasing the minimum age to buy a gun from 18 to 21 years old, and establishing more comprehensive background checks on all purchasers of firearms.”

He added that they should push for “more effective and more lasting reform.”

“They should demand a repeal of the Second Amendment.”

Hundreds of thousands of protesters gathered in cities across the U.S. last weekend for rallies organized in the wake of a deadly mass shooting at a high school in Parkland, Fla.

Survivors of that shooting have emerged as some of the most vocal advocates for new gun control laws and have called on lawmakers to distance themselves from the National Rifle Association and strengthen firearm restrictions.

Dems’ Horrifying Plan For Trump’s Secret Service Just Emerged – His Life Is In IMMINENT Danger!

This gave terrorists an easy target.

President Donald Trump and his family faced imminent danger after finding out what sick plan was in store for them and the White House Secret Service.

Everyone who serves as President of the United States of America deserves the best security money can buy. This is the leader of the country and he deserves to be protected at all costs, just like the leaders of other countries deserve their own levels of protection from sick attacks and people gunning for their heads. It’s now being reported that there was a dire situation at the White House which called for people to immediately step in and thwart the plan that would have placed Trump and his entire family in an irresponsible amount of danger due to a ridiculous lack of protection. This was so bad that one must wonder if it was done on purpose to take Trump out or run him out of the White House via a potential scare or attack.

The information we’ve read stats that one of the people Trump appointed to an important role as the Secret Service director, named Randolph ‘Tex’ Alles had come up with the disappointing plan that could have placed Trump and his family in danger. It’s reported that Tex wanted to withdraw security protection from some of Trump’s family members, even though they’ve often been targeted by critics who are still angry at the results of the 2016 election. With all the violence stemming from the left, it would have been an absolutely horrible mistake to remove security details from Trump or his family, as that would have placed anyone without security in the line of fire for an easier attack.

Tex’s plan got out and the White House caught wind of the plan that would ultimately leave people in harm’s way. The White House shut down the proposal immediately after they found out that Tex wanted to place people in danger just so that he could save the White House a few dollars on their security bill.

Some Democrats were possibly hoping this horrible proposal went through. You could only imagine someone like Nancy Pelosi laughing out of control over it.

Daily Mail reported more about this information which is being revealed in a book by Ronald Kessler: “President Donald Trump’s appointee for Secret Service director proposed saving money by withdrawing security protection for some of the president’s family members and aides unless they had received threats, according to a new book.

President Donald Trump’s appointee for Secret Service director, Randolph ‘Tex’ Alles proposed withdrawing security protection for some of Trump’s family members

Randolph ‘Tex’ Alles proposed the cutback to save on the Secret Service’s $2 billion budget, according to Ronald Kessler’s upcoming book, The Trump White House: Changing the Rules of the Game.

Instead of visualizing what it would be like if al Qaeda or ISIS took Ivanka Trump hostage, Alles was worried about deploying some of the agency’s 3,200 agents to protect her, the book says.

The proposal was immediately shut down by White House staffers, Kessler says, adding that throughout history no assassination or assassination attempt to hit the White House has been preceded by a threat.

‘Horrified White House staff immediately shot down Alles’ proposal to cut back on protection,’ Kessler writes.

He adds: ‘Especially given the hatred directed at Trump and his family, the idea that the director of the Secret Service would entertain dropping protection of the president’s family members is itself a scandal and all anyone needs to know about why Alles should be replaced before a tragedy occurs.’

Kessler, a New York Times-bestselling author who previously wrote The First Family Detail: Secret Service Agents Reveal the Hidden Lives of the Presidents, says that one of the Secret Service’s failings is its ingrained cultural attitude that ‘we make do with less’.”

Randolph ‘Tex’ Alles served in the United States Marine Corps and retired in 2011. He was previously the deputy commissioner of Customs and Border Protection and later slated to act as the director of the Secret Service. It seems as though his goal was to save money, but it also appears as though his plan to save money came at a risk of placing others in danger.

Thankfully his budget proposal was shut down and security details remained actively working for Trump’s family. The White House was diligent in their ability to turn down a proposal that could have placed people in the line of a terror attack. There’s no amount of money that’s worth it to watch high-level people risk their lives on a daily basis.

Tex may have made this mistake once, but hopefully, he has learned that he must keep the security detail high in order to protect the leaders of the best country on the planet. American leaders and their family must be protected at all times. Every President, regardless if you like them or not, deserves the highest levels of Secret Service protection that America can provide.


Trump pushes for added powers in spending fights


Trump pushes for added powers in spending fights

President Trump’s call for a line-item veto of spending bills is the latest example of his frustration with the rules of Washington.

Trump urged Congress to give him the veto power during an event late last week when signing a $1.3 trillion spending bill that included a number of provisions he didn’t like. He also repeated his call for the Senate to end its filibuster rule that means most bills need 60 votes to pass.

“To prevent the omnibus situation from ever happening again, I’m calling on Congress to give me a line-item veto for all government spending bills,” Trump said. “And the Senate must end — they must end the filibuster rule and get down to work.”

A traditional line-item veto — allowing the president to unilaterally cancel parts of a bill — was ruled unconstitutional by the Supreme Court in 1998. Since then, presidents and members of Congress have pushed other proposals to give the president greater ability to cancel spending programs, but those efforts haven’t been successful.

While it’s highly unlikely that Trump would receive powers approximating a line-item veto, allies say the president’s calls send a message to his base that he hears their frustrations about excessive spending and the obstacles to enacting his agenda.

“He’s showing that he’s concerned with out-of-control spending,” said GOP strategist Ford O’Connell.

The omnibus clocked in at more than 2,200 pages, and received a vote in the House less than 24 hours after it was introduced. Many conservative lawmakers voted against the bill, complaining both about the rushed process and its impact on the deficit.

While administration officials emphasized that Trump would sign the bill, the president floated a possible veto early Friday, hours before the signing ceremony. Trump said he signed the bill in order to help the military, but made it clear that he was frustrated that the omnibus also included items that he considered to be wasteful in order to get the support of Democrats.

“I say to Congress: I will never sign another bill like this again,” Trump declared.

When asked about the call for a line-item veto on Monday, White House deputy press secretary Raj Shah said Trump wants to reform the budget process.

“The president outlined on Friday why he was very frustrated with the legislation that he was given,” Shah said during a press briefing.

Trump ran for president as a businessman with no prior political experience who promised to “drain the swamp.” Time and again, he’s expressed frustration with the slow pace at which he’s been able to accomplish items on his agenda, in part because of pushback from Congress.

“He’s in a tough spot. It’s a lot different running a company than being president where there are two other branches that have as much power as you do,” said Brandon Arnold, executive vice president of the National Taxpayers Union, which opposed the omnibus.

The spending bill may have been a particularly bitter pill to swallow because by signing it, Trump was enacting legislation opposed by conservative lawmakers and advocacy groups. And if Democrats take control of the House after the midterm elections, Trump will have to negotiate with Democrats even more.

“Republicans know if they’re not in power, [spending is] just going to continue to explode,” O’Connell said, calling the omnibus “a perpetuate-the-swamp bill.”

Frustration with Congress and the budget process on the part of the president isn’t new to Trump. Past presidents have also sought a line-item veto or similar powers.

In 1996, the Republican-controlled Congress passed, and President Clinton signed, a law that allowed the president to have a line-item veto to cancel certain tax and spending provisions. But two years later, the Supreme Court said that law violated the Constitution’s presentment clause, which outlines the specific steps for bills to become law.

Shah signaled that the White House is looking into how to achieve Trump’s goal in light of the constitutional barriers.

“There are certain things being discussed with respect to House and Senate rules,” he said. “I don’t want to get ahead of anything that we may come out in favor of.”

One route the administration could try to take would be to push for an option known as “expedited rescission authority” that was advocated by both Presidents George W. Bush and Barack Obama during their tenures.

Under this idea, after a bill is signed, the president would submit a request to Congress with provisions of the measure that he wants cut. Congress would then be required to take an up-or-down vote on canceling the provisions within a certain timeframe.

In 2012, a bill to give presidents such authority passed the House with some bipartisan support but stalled in the Senate.

The bill was sponsored by then-House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan (R-Wis.) and then-ranking member Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.). Ryan, who now serves as Speaker, continues to back the idea.

“In the past, Republicans and Democrats have come together to support a constitutional ‘line-item veto’ that would enable the president to propose targeted cuts in spending and to ensure his proposals are promptly acted on by Congress,” Ryan spokeswoman AshLee Strong said. “The Speaker continues to support this tool to eliminate wasteful spending.”

Conservative groups and budget watchdogs have also supported the idea of expedited rescission authority for presidents, arguing that it would help rein in spending.

“We think there should be a way for the president to remove an item he feels is unnecessary,” said Thomas Schatz, president of Citizens Against Government Waste.

Legislation to create some type of line-item veto may be offered in the near future. Following Trump’s remarks on Friday, Rep. Ron DeSantis (R-Fla.) — a member of the conservative House Freedom Caucus who is running for governor — said on Twitter that he’d introduce a proposal on the topic “very soon.”

While Democrats are expected to oppose a bill that gives Trump more power and it’s doubtful any line-item veto proposal will get enacted in the near future, conservatives see the issue as a smart cause for lawmakers and Trump to take up.

“I think it would force Congress to face its addiction on spending, which is currently a bipartisan disease,” said Andrew Roth, vice president of government affairs at the Club for Growth. “And Trump would clearly be on the side of the American people, who are tired of these trillion-dollar deficits Congress keeps racking up.”

Bill O’Reilly Points Out Two Dirty Tricks About Stormy’s Interview That Proves Her Deceit

The American people don’t care what Donald Trump did years ago before he became President.

However, the mainstream media fights to keep the gossip going as their Russia/Collusion narrative is over.

The mainstream media has run out of ideas and will continue to push anything to make President Trump look bad. They are so desperate to try to ruin Trump’s Presidency, and will continue to not cover the actual achievements that President Trump and his administration are doing.

Stormy Daniels recently interviewed with CNN’s Anderson Cooper Sunday night on 60 Minutes. During her salacious interview, she discussed her alleged one night affair with Donald Trump 12 years ago. CNN is obsessed with this porn star now.

The White House pushed back denying the allegations. In addition “Stormy Daniels” has also denied having any sexual relations with Trump on 2 separate occasions.

But, many are questioning Stormy Daniels statements from her interview. (See below)

Bill O’ Reilly came forward Monday morning slamming Stormy while pointing out her lies during the interview in a tweet storm.

O’Reilly tweeted, “So much for the porn performer on “60 Minutes” who’s story doesn’t stack. She says she didn’t want money to attack Donald Trump but accepted money. She doesn’t want money now either. So why are you on national television with all this garbage? Does that help your daughter?”

“If someone threatened your young child with harm, would you not go to the police? Even after you saw the man who did it?”

So, Anderson, some guy threatened my baby daughter to my face but I was too scared to tell the police but not too scared to tell @60Minutes.”

“Also, Anderson, I never wanted money but accepted money and tried to sell my Trump story to a newspaper. But I never wanted money. Are you hearing me, Anderson???? Honest analysis on”

The left’s new obsession is Stormy Daniels because the Russian collusion is dead. They want to find any reason to hate the President and make him out to be the worst person ever.

Stormy Daniels is CNN’s new vessel right now and they are using her like a puppet. In two years she will be broke and a nobody.

We Deplorables elected President Trump to Build the Wall and Drain The Swamp. We did not elect him to be our PASTOR.

Do you stand with President Trump 100%? Let us know what you think the comments below.

Finally Confirms What She’s Hidden For MONTHS – Broken Hillary Goes Into Psychotic Rage In India

Former presidential candidate Hillary Clinton can’t seem to manage to stay on her toes these days. But when it comes to attacking President Trump, and his family she can run a marathon. And although she is currently on a worldwide speaking tour she still manages to both attack and slip and fall.

After leaving India, where she made a spectacle of herself after showing the world how the person who wanted to be the US president walks down a flight of stairs, Hillary made an appearance on Dutch TV, where she was asked about the possibility of President Trump’s daughter becoming the first woman US president. To which she replied the same way she replied when in 2016 she was asked if Donald Trump could beat her. She said, ‘That’s not going to happen.’

Image result for Broken Hillary Goes Into Psychotic Rage In India – Finally Confirms What She’s Hidden For MONTHS

If you watch a translated version of the interview closely you can see what Hillary’s real issue is. She’s just terrified of the prospect of Ivanka Trump becoming the first woman president of the United States of America. And although she might belittle and ridicule the idea, she pretty much knows the threat is real and the US might very well have Madam President Trump sometime in the future.

It must be a sad existence having to be Hillary. She is the only presidential candidate in US history to have been beaten by a total outsider who had never held public office before, not even school board.

And to top it off she just can’t seem to take her loss with grace and dignity. She is currently on a tour of the world where she has attacked and tried to belittle our president and those of us who voted for him, which in turn has shown the world who she really is.

Image result for Broken Hillary Goes Into Psychotic Rage In India – Finally Confirms What She’s Hidden For MONTHS

Sad to see that instead of helping advance our glorious nation, she is impeding it. John McCain and Mitt Romney didn’t do that when they lost to Obama.
Here’s some more info as to how candidate Clinton reacted to losing the 2016 election via Breitbart:

‘The mystery of Hillary Clinton, milk-carton missing on election night, appears solved.

A Tuesday of catharsis for Donald Trump voters turned into an evening of rage for Hillary Clinton. The Democratic presidential nominee, anticipating the post-election reaction of many of her supporters, began shouting profanities, banging tables, and turning objects not nailed down into projectiles.

‘Sources have told The American Spectator that on Tuesday night after Hillary realized she had lost, she went into a rage,’ R. Emmett Tyrrell reports. ‘Secret Service officers told at least one source that she began yelling, screaming obscenities, and pounding furniture. She picked up objects and threw them at attendants and staff. She was in an uncontrollable rage.’

Image result for Broken Hillary Goes Into Psychotic Rage In India – Finally Confirms What She’s Hidden For MONTHS

The appearance of campaign chairman John Podesta at Manhattan’s Javitz Center, and the dematerialization of his heretofore ubiquitous charge, perplexed in the first hours of Wednesday.
‘They’re still counting votes, and every vote should count,’ Podesta declared to a sad and stunned hall. ‘Several states are too close to call, so we’re not going to have anything more to say tonight.’

As Podesta recalcitrantly refused to recognize reality early Wednesday morning, Hillary Clinton called Donald Trump to offer congratulations. The juxtaposition of the campaign chairman publicly vowing to fight around the time the candidate privately conceded the election left observers scratching their heads.

Tyrrell’s reporting indicates that Mrs. Clinton’s mental state made it impossible for her to address her supporters on election night as custom requests. So, instead, Podesta gave a rah-rah speech on a boo-hoo night to cover for the absence of the first woman president, her fireworks, and her victory speech shout-outs to the mothers of the Black Lives Matter martyrs.

Image result for Broken Hillary Goes Into Psychotic Rage In India – Finally Confirms What She’s Hidden For MONTHS

‘She is not done yet,’ Podesta claimed. Tyrrell’s reporting indicates that, indeed, Clinton remained far from done.
‘Her aides could not allow her to come out in public,’ he writes. ‘It would take her hours to calm down. So Podesta went out and gave his aimless speech. I wish we could report on Bill’s whereabouts but we cannot.’

Bill appeared the following day at Hillary’s belated concession speech wearing a purple tie but, thankfully, no purple marks about his face, suggesting experience dictated avoidance the previous evening.
‘People say they’re amazed Bill’s marriage survived,’ Tyrrell noted to Breitbart. ‘I’m amazed Bill survived his marriage.’

Tyrrell’s reporting remains a thorn in the side of the Clintons more than two decades after the American Spectator published its Troopergate stories detailing Bill Clinton’s escapades as told by his Arkansas security detail, stories that first referenced Paula Jones and pushed the president on the road to impeachment. Nearly 19 years after Hillary Clinton imagined a ‘vast, right-wing conspiracy’ out to get her husband, the cabal’s charter member again relies on the accounts of the Clintons’ long-suffering security to unmask the public faces worn by the power couple now out of power.

‘In the ’90s, we published several pieces that documented her throwing lamps and books,’ Tyrrell tells Breitbart. ‘This happened pretty often. She has such a foul mouth that the Arkansas state troopers learned a thing or two from her. She has a foul mouth and a good throwing arm.’